This chapter addresses the planning principles and policies that provide the framework for new land development in Chester County. Planning principles are the desired goals while the design concepts are the means to achieve the goals. From these principles and concepts, actual design is accomplished through more quantifiable, measurable design elements which are discussed in Chapter 3 'Design Elements'.
Principles and design concepts must be considered throughout the plan development - before a design is started, during the design process, and in the final review of a plan. If correctly applied, principles and concepts can lead to a properly functioning circulation system which is compatible with existing and future land uses.
"Automobile dependency refers to transportation and land use patterns that favor automobile travel and provide relatively inferior alternatives. Its opposite, multimodalism, refers to a transport system that offers users diverse transport options that are effectively integrated, in order to provide a high degree of accessibility even for non-drivers."
- Todd Litman, Multi-Modal Transportation Planning, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2014
Multimodal planning gives recognition to the fact that planners, engineers, developers and public officials must find alternative means of dealing with existing and future traffic problems. Experiences across the country point to the need to manage the demand for travel through: ride-sharing, altering work trip patterns, expanding opportunities for modes of travel other than the automobile and managing access on existing roads. Addressing the circulation side of the problem is not the only approach. The integration of land use and transportation planning within a community can lead to fewer vehicular trips, a safer circulation network and more attractive surroundings.
Effective and responsible planning for a community is based on careful considerations of laws and regulations, planning principles, design concepts, design elements and coordination among all parties involved with development and circulation. The same considerations can be applied to individual land developments. One of the foundations of successful land development is the proper accommodation of multimodal circulation within the development, at all access points to the development, and along the adjacent roads which serve the development. A properly functioning multimodal circulation system leads to more desirable, marketable developments and more viable communities.
Establishing the Policy Framework
Landscapes2 is Chester County's comprehensive policy plan. It has brought together growth management and preservation strategies. It has guided municipalities, developers, preservationists, and many others in setting priorities for where and how our county grows—including both how to revitalize our urban centers and small towns and how best to protect our natural, rural, and historic heritage.
Landscapes2 states the following regarding land use, transportation, and multimodal facilities:
"Land use and transportation interact in dynamic fashion, where land use policy affects transportation behaviors and transportation policy affects land use behaviors. It is the management of this relationship that is transportation planning."
"No single travel mode will accommodate our needs. A sole reliance on the automobile has limitations and costs. Transit options are needed in most communities, along with facilities for bicyclists and pedestrians."
The Landscapes2 System-wide transportation policy (T 1.4) regarding land use:
T 1.4 Integrate - Coordinate the regulation, enhancement, and impacts of land use and transportation to effectively promote sustainable transportation choices and behaviors.
- T 1.4a Encourage appropriate and supportive land uses, density, and site designs that reduce vehicular dependency, encourage public transportation, and provide bicycle and pedestrian mobility.
- T 1.4b Encourage increased development density where supportive transportation infrastructure exists.
- T 1.4c Promote a corridor-planning approach to integrate transportation investments and land use policies.
The concept of "livable landscapes" provides a framework for protection and growth strategies within Chester County. The Livable Landscapes map serves as a guide for accommodating expected future growth while maintaining the quality of life in the county.
Multimodal Transportation Corridors
Landscapes2 states the following:
The foundation of a "system-wide" approach to transportation planning is close coordination of various transportation modes and the surrounding land uses that are served and supported. The map (below) highlights this critical relationship between transportation infrastructure and the identified growth area, particularly urban and suburban centers. The major multi-modal corridors encompass key roadways, active rail lines, passenger rail stations, bus routes, regional trails, airports and the PA Turnpike interchange. These corridors are priorities for maintaining and investing in our transportation system to support efficient movement of people and goods.
Public Transportation Plan
In July of 2014, the Chester County Commissioners adopted the Public Transportation Plan as an element to Landscapes2. This plan was structured around three main categories of issues concerning public transportation: the SYSTEM (everything that is operating or 'rolling' such as bus routes, commuter rail services, etc.), the ENVIRONMENT (all points of access to the system, including rail stations, transportation centers, bus stops), and the EXPERIENCE (reflected by everyone that utilizes the public transportation system).
The category whereby Chester County will have the most direct influence in improving public transportation services is within the realm of the built ENVIRONMENT. The plan's ENVIRONMENT goal is to:
"Provide a first class, barrier-free and multimodal means of transport from trip origin to trip destination."
One of the objectives towards achieving that goal is to encourage local growth area municipalities and engage developers in the creation and adoption of ordinances to provide for the integral development of transit related facilities and/or land uses.
PennDOT Smart Transportation
The New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) and the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) jointly prepared and published their Smart Transportation Guidebook in March 2008. Its focus is to guide the development of non-limited access roads as context sensitive roadways, with the goal of creating transportation facilities that work well for all users, are affordable, and support smart growth community planning goals.
The following are the Smart Transportation Principles as published in the Guidebook:
- Tailor solutions to the context;
- Tailor the approach;
- Plan all projects in collaboration with the community;
- Plan for alternative transportation modes;
- Use sound professional judgment; and,
- Scale the solution to the size of the problem.
These principles constitute the basic philosophy of providing for a 'context sensitive' design. These principles constitute the basic philosophy of providing for a 'context sensitive' design. Notably, the Smart Transportation Guidebook introduce context sensitive engineering (where land use context changes the roadway design). Following the 2008 publication, these land use considerations were incorporated into PennDOT's design manuals.
The land use contexts described in the Smart Transportation Guidebook from least to most developed are as follows:
- Suburban Neighborhood.
- Suburban Corridor.
- Suburban Center.
- Town/Village Neighborhood.
- Town/Village Center.
- Urban Core.
The contexts from Suburban Neighborhood (2) to Urban Core (7) correlate to the Landscapes2 Growth Areas, with Rural being synonymous in both publications.
The following are the principles towards which this Multimodal Handbook intends to guide future land developments in Chester County:
Create pedestrian-oriented experiences and design to the human scale. Providing for a pleasant environment that any person would experience should be a guiding principle in the planning, design, and construction of all new developments and/or redevelopments. Universal accessibility, building placement, mode separation, landscaping, signage, noise mitigation, and the creation of outdoor spaces play a major role in contributing to the aesthetics and human experience and thus the success of any development.
Integrate development as part of the community fabric. Land developments should consider not only the site specific conditions for design and implementation, but also how these developments can contribute to the community within which they are placed. Developments should be considered as part of the community building process rather than simply stand-alone projects.
Provide for all transportation modes. The transportation system is not exclusive to the automobile and should provide opportunities for bicyclists, pedestrians and public transit. Roadways should be designed to accommodate public transportation which would assist traffic flow and capacity. Public transportation facilities connect high-density population and employment centers where cost effective and help to reduce highway congestion and improve air quality by reducing the number of trips made by single occupant vehicles. Clearly defined pedestrian routes should be provided between residential, commercial and office developments and public transit facilities such as bus stops, rail stations, and transportation centers. Pedestrian and bicycle linkages should be created throughout and between all major developments since they serve as both transportation and recreation resources that contribute to bettering the community's overall health and well-being. Consideration for all of these modes will provide for a true multimodal transportation system in Chester County.
Incorporate sustainable design features. Site development should be designed to provide for long term sustainability and minimize the impacts to the natural environment. Roadways and parking lots are the biggest contributor towards stormwater runoff causing erosion and the inflow of chemicals such as road salts and de-icing agents that impact water quality in Chester County's waterways. While many best management practices infiltrate and/or treat stormwater before being discharged into local streams, minimizing the development footprint which includes not only the creation of new impervious surfaces but for all earth disturbance activity associated with land development would reduce this increased runoff at its source. In most cases, making roadways and site developments more compatible with their natural settings and avoiding impacts to wetlands, floodplains, forests, wildlife habitats, and other natural areas is the best way to apply this principle.
Accommodate future growth. Enough highway and intersection capacity should be provided through ultimate rights-of-way to accommodate peak hour demand from new land developments and preserve the future capacity and safety of arterial and collector roads. Municipalities and developers within growth areas should incorporate bus and other transit design concepts within subdivision and land development proposals to accommodate the future use of public transportation. High-density housing and employment centers should be located near established public transportation routes and centers. Adjacent developments should be interconnected to reduce the amount of vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle trips accessing arterial and collector roads for local circulation.
The land use context can vary significantly along the roadway regardless of the roadway's functional class. While PA 10 is a minor arterial in all three examples, one can see how the land use context varies along PA 10 in Chester County. The transportation design of PA 10 adjusts to the land use context. This is a key evolution of transportation engineering over the last decade: design for the context. This approach results in improved accomodations for all modes and a more context sensitive design.
Defining the Context
Step 1: Determing Land Use Context
The location of the proposed development relative to the Landscapes2 livable landscapes will have a bearing on various design guidelines as denoted in the Chapter 3 Design Elements. Please refer to the Livable Landscapes Map to determine if the proposed development is located within a Growth Area or a Rural Resources Area.
Step 2: Determine Roadway's Functional Classification
Roadway functional classification an important land use and transportation planning tool that establishes a hierarchy of roads based on use relating to mobility and access. As a tool, functional classification provides a basis for the integration of land use and transportation through road design, access design and all relevant land use ordinances.
The overriding principle that guides the integration of land use and circulation is the need to establish and maintain a hierarchy of roads based on intended function. This is what is generally referred to as highway functional classification. Roadways serve two basic functions--mobility and access. Mobility is defined as the ability to carry traffic and is measured by volume, speed and trip length. Access is defined as the ability to move traffic to and from abutting land uses.
There is a fundamental incompatibility between mobility and access. Access to adjacent parcels generally inhibits or restricts the ability of a road to carry high volumes at high speeds. Conversely, high-speed traffic is incompatible and disruptive on roads such as residential streets which are primarily intended to provide access to abutting properties. Roadways fail when the design and use are not compatible with the intended function. For example, if a major road is intended to carry high volume, high speed traffic, but the adjacent properties are developed with an excessive number of access points, the conflict between mobility and access will result in higher accident rates and increased congestion.
The classification that was established by the Chester County Planning Commission followed an eight-step process that led to adoption by the Planning Commission in 2003. The adoption focused on a map of the classification and a table of specific variables and criteria that was used to define and delineate the classification. The eight step process and table of specific variables, along with mapping of the entire county designating the functional class of each roadway may be found in the Road Functional Classification Technical Memorandum, published by the Planning Commission in June 2004.
The adopted classification is comparable in scale to the classifications set at the regional, state and national levels. About 3 percent of the network mileage in the County consists of expressways. The arterials represent almost 10 percent of the mileage. Collectors represent about 20 percent of the mileage. The bulk of the mileage (over 2/3) consists of local roads, which in this context refers to their function and not necessarily ownership.
Approximately 12 percent of the road mileage carries 70 percent of the traffic. This relates to the circulatory analogy where the expressway and arterials are the lifeblood of the network.
In terms of the relationship of the functional classification to Landscapes2, the County's comprehensive policy plan, there is a strong nexus between the function of the major roads and their impact on the growth areas in the plan and on the preservation areas.
The following exhibit illustrates select criteria and variables associated the functional classifications and how those criteria and variables differ between the Landscapes2 Growth Areas and Rural Areas:
|Variables||Expressway||Major Arterial||Minor Arterial||Major Collector||Minor Collector||Local Distributor||Local|
|Daily Traffic Volume Range (1)||15,000 to over 100,000 vehicles||10,000-60,000 vehicles||8,000-20,000 vehicles||4,000-10,000 vehicles||1,000-5,000 vehicles||Less than 1,500 vehicles||Less than 1,000 vehicles|
|Mobility||Strict priority to moving vehicles||Mobility more critical than property access||Mobility more critical than property access||Even priority to mobility and access||Even priority to mobility and access||Access more important than mobility||No priority to mobility|
|Access||Only at interchanges||Strict median access control||Some control of property access||All roads and properties have access||All roads and properties have access||Priority is given to property access||Priority is given to property access|
|Corridor Length||Over 15 miles||Over 15 miles||Over 10 miles||4-15 miles||2-10 miles||Less than 4 miles||Less than 2 miles|
|Connections (Relationship to LANDSCAPES)||Connects states, regions, counties, cities and landscapes urban centers||Connects regions, counties and multiple landscapes centers||Connects multiple landscapes centers some inter-county trips||Connects landscapes centers and villages, primarily intra-county trips||Connects villages and multiple neighborhoods primarily intra-county trips||Connects neighborhoods some intermunicipal trips||Links individual properties to distributors and collectors|
|Truck Traffic||Highest truck mobility||High truck mobility||High truck mobility||Moderate truck mobility||Moderate truck mobility||Local delivery only||Local delivery only|
|Basic Geometry and Design||Wide lanes and shoulders; medians; more than 2 through lanes||Wide lanes and shoulders; occasional median; turning lanes||Wide lanes and shoulders; no medians; turning lanes||Two lanes; no medians; limited turning lanes||Two lanes; no medians; limited turning lanes||Narrow Lanes||Narrow Lanes|
|On-Street Parking||Prohibited||Only in urban areas||Only in urban areas||Discouraged outside "centers"||Discouraged outside "centers"||Limited use outside"centers"||Appropriate on selected streets|
|Through Traffic (2)||Over 50%||Over 50%||Over 50%||25-50%||25-50%||Less than 25%||Less than 10%|
|Vehicle Speed (Posted)||55-65 mph; 40 mph minimum||35-55 mph||35-55 mph||35-55 mph||35-55 mph||Less than 45 mph||Less than 35 mph|
|Bicycle Pedestrian Access||Only through separate facilities||Specially designed facilities||Adjacent facilities and crossings||Adjacent facilities and crossings||Adjacent facilities and crossings||High priority to bike and pedestrian access||High priority to bike and pedestrian access|
Step 3: Translate between CCPC and PennDOT termingology
The following chart provides the translation key between the Planning Commission's Highway Functional Classification and Landscapes2: Livable Landscapes and the PennDOT Smart Transportation highway classification and land use contexts, with examples of such roadways located in Chester County:
|Chester County Planning Commission||Landscapes2||Urban||Suburban Center||Suburban||Rural Center/Villages||Rural||Ag|
|Highway Functional Classification||PennDOT Smart Transportation||Town/Village Center & Neighborhood||Suburban Center||Suburban Corridor & Neighborhood||Town/Village Center||Rural||Rural|
|Expressway||Expressway||US 202, US 30, US 1, PA Turnpike|
|Major Arterial||Regional Arterial||PA 3 - West Chester
PA 252 - Paoli
|PA 100 - Exton
PA 41 - London Grove
|PA 3 - E/W Goshen
US 322 - E Brandywine
|PA 41 - Chatham
PA 100 - Bucktown
|PA 252 - Easttown
US 322 - E Bradford
|PA 41 - W Fallowfield
US 322 - Honey Brook
|Minor Arterial||Community Arterial||PA 10 - Honey Brook
PA 82 - Kennett Sq
|PA 796 - Jennersville
PA 29 - Great Valley
|PA 352 - E Goshen
PA 401 - W Pikeland
|PA 401 - Ludwigs Corner
PA 724 - Spring City
|PA 113 - W/E Pikeland
PA 82 - W Marlborough
|PA 10 - Upper Oxford
PA 23 - Warwick
|Major Collector||Community Collector||PA 82 - Elverson
PA 113 - Phoenixville
|Swedsford Rd - Exton
Little Congs. Rd - Eagle
|King Rd - E Goshen
PA 282 - E Brandywine
|PA 162 - Marshallton
PA 272 - Nottingham
|Strasburg Road - W Bradford
Pughtown Rd - E Vincent
|PA 340 - W Caln
PA 82 - W Nantmeal
|Minor Collector||Collector Neighborhood||Rosedale Av - W Chester
Warren Av - Malvern
|GO Carlson Blvd - Caln
Waterloo Rd - Devon
|Hillendale Rd - Kennett
Greenhill Rd - W Goshen
|St. Peters Rd - Warwick
PA 162 - Unionville
|PA 345 - Warwick
Fairview Rd - E Nantmeal
|PA 841 - W Marlborough
PA 926 - Londonderry
|Local Distributor||Local||Bradford Av - W Chester
Todd Rd - Honey Brook
|Liberty Blvd - Great Valley
Shoen Rd - W Whiteland
|Concord Rd - Westtown
Pleasant Grove Rd - Westtown
|Appleton Rd - Franklin
Nanteal Rd - E Nantmeal
|Creek Road - W Bradford
Horseshoe Tr Rd - W Vincent
|B. Creek Rd - Newlin
Ridge Rd - W Nottingham
Step 4: Apply Design Criteria
Please use the land use context and the functional classification of the roadway(s) that will serve as the developments primary point(s) of access to determine the applicability of the design elements described in Chepter 3 towards the proposed development.